Yesterday I attended a presentation at Northeastern Illinois University made possible by the Students for Justice in Palestine. Called Palestine/Israel through Ebony Eyes, it was a talk given by Dr. Gilo Kwesi Logan, an adjunct professor at NEIU and veteran of 43 trips to over 20 countries around the world. The talk was for the purpose of spreading to the general public what had been discovered in a trip by a group of 15 African-Americans hosted by Interfaith Peace Builders.
Though Americans may have decided views on the situation there, these views, unfortunately, are rarely informed by facts or experience and frequently come from hearsay or a story provided by supporters of Israel who themselves are not knowledgeable on the situation. If one depends on what one hears from American politicians, including the President, a distorted, if not completely false, idea of what is happening there is likely.
Dr. Logan stressed to us that he was not expressing only his own take on the visit, but a composite of the findings of all who went with him, a group of six men and nine women.
The room was filled. Extra chairs had to be brought in to provide enough seating. I was pleased to see this amount of interest. At one point, Logan asked how many in the audience had heard of Rachel Corrie, the young woman killed by an IDF bulldozer in 2003. About a third raised their hands. This was another encouraging sign to me, because those who follow events from Israel/Palestine would certainly know of Rachel - this talk was accomplishing its purpose in spreading the word.
There was little in the talk that I did not know about from previous exposure. I expected that because I make it my daily business to know what is happening over there. But I know the impact initial impressions can have - one of the first images to open my mind to Israel/Palestine reality was of giant bulldozers (like the one that killed Rachel Corrie) clearing Palestinian land to allow for new Israeli settlements as an elderly Palestinian helplessly watched his land seized by others; a microcosm of the entire history of Israel. I hope that those attending this talk will be equally incensed at the injustice related by eyewitnesses. The prolonged, intrusive and disrespectful treatment Dr. Logan received on entry to and exit from Israel was distressing to hear about, but common practice.
Since Interfaith Peace Builders is a human rights organization, it's no surprise that on this visit other such organizations played host for the group. A short video was shown of Jeff Halper (who I'm happy to say I have met) of the Israeli Committee Against Housing Demolitions, offering an overview of the situation in which the powerful abuse the powerless. Ruth Hiller of New Profile, a group that opposes the militarism of Israeli society, was also mentioned by Dr. Logan. Surprisingly, the New Profile website in English will not come up when I try to access it, but Jewish Voice for Peace has an extended interview with Ruth Hiller online.
An aspect of Dr. Logan's presentation that I appreciated was his habit of pausing when text was displayed so that we could all read it for ourselves or write down some of the information. Nothing is worse that a presenter droning out text that everyone can read. I suspect he knows this from painful experience in the classroom. But text was rare, people and places usually filled the screen. We saw the infamous wall and barbed wire, the screens of Hebron that keep settler refuse from falling on Palestinians, children playing amid rubble, a row of female IDF soldiers with automatic weapons slung on their backs, and a nice selection of pictures showing Dr. Logan posing with those he met, all part of the human family that we are. He told us that the Palestinians repeatedly refused to take monetary contributions, instead asking only that their story be told....exactly what Dr. Logan did for us (and them) in what I would call an act of public service, out of respect for the human rights that we want all to enjoy.
That Americans be told what is happening is vital because of the undeniable fact that only American support allows Israel's injustice to not only continue but expand. The careful tip-toeing that our president did in his recent visit to the area, where he was at pains not go beyond giving the tiniest bit of unease to those who forcefully abase the native population, should be a frightening example to all Americans of how our foreign policy regarding Israel/Palestine is held captive to a Zionist outlook which has no place in a country that claims to support liberty and justice for all.
Dr. Logan and SJP, not only at NEIU but nationwide, should be praised for acting in the tradition of the America of justice and human rights, not the one of arms sales and compromise on fundamental principles. To pay no attention, to not inquire, to do nothing is always a great support for tyranny.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Herzl's vision vs Israel's reality
Theodore Herzl is considered the founder of Zionism as laid out in his book Der Judenstaat (1895).
Today, President Obama on a visit to Israel has laid a wreath at the grave of Herzl, paying him honor in doing so. But the State of Israel is quite different from what Herzl had in mind. A comment on the site, Mondoweiss by Palestinian Ramzi Jaber, puts this in a listing as follows...
Today, President Obama on a visit to Israel has laid a wreath at the grave of Herzl, paying him honor in doing so. But the State of Israel is quite different from what Herzl had in mind. A comment on the site, Mondoweiss by Palestinian Ramzi Jaber, puts this in a listing as follows...
Obama must keep the following 12 facts in mind:
1- Palestinians are the gererous party who are willing to share our land with Israel
2- Herzl dreamed up Zionism to solve a non-Palestinian problem: Jews not being welcome in Europe
3- Zionism imposed a state over land that did not belong to Jews
4- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, the region is not better off because of Israel
5- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel is not a secular democracy
6- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel is not the only democracy in the Middle East.
7- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel is NOT the vanguard of a westernized Middle East (but a throwback to 19th century Europe - CB)
8- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel is not the solution to the Jewish problem
9- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel has created Palestinian homelessness
10- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, emerging popular Middle Eastern governments are not Israel’s allies
11- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel is no longer the oppressed but rather the only superpower (plus nukes) in the ME
12- Contrary to what Herzl dreamed up, Israel never moved beyond 1800s mentality
Friday, March 15, 2013
the media tiptoes into the water
Because of the fear of being labeled anti-Semitic, critics of Israel have been muzzled. The farce of the Hagel hearing in the Senate broadcast this for all to see. Such events gradually will make the muzzling so obvious that it will become increasingly ineffective, just as with the boy who cried wolf.
Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper, has published an article in which TV personality Alex Wagner speaks on the subject of intimidation on the subject of Israel. Here it is...
Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper, has published an article in which TV personality Alex Wagner speaks on the subject of intimidation on the subject of Israel. Here it is...
MSNBC host Alex Wagner: Fear of anti-Semitism charge inhibits 'robust discussion' about Israel
As the 'progressive' network gears up to cover President Obama’s visit to Israel, the anchor of the daily “NOW with Alex Wagner” describes the media conversation about Israel in the U.S. as 'incredibly tricky.'
MSNBC midday host Alex Wagner believes that there is an element of “trepidation” that inhibits a “robust discussion” about Israel in the American media.
“Look at our secretary of defense’s nomination process – that was hugely incendiary and complicated in large part because of comments that he made about Israel and the power of the Jewish vote in America,” Wagner said. “To be honest, I think it’s difficult for some people to figure out how to talk about that and if they are critical, how to do so in a respectful fashion and in way that doesn’t end up being a conversation about anti-Semitism.”
Wagner, an up-and-coming star of the left-leaning news network and the host of the daily “NOW with Alex Wagner” program, said Israel is a “very important and potent subject that people are genuinely curious about, but are perhaps not educated enough about it or are trepidatious about tackling it.”
“I think it’s incredibly tricky to talk about this unless you are incredibly fluent on the issue and you have a nuanced and comprehensive grasp of what’s going on,” she said.
Wagner spoke to Haaretz at MSNBC headquarters in Manhattan’s Rockefeller Center as part of a PR effort by NBC news network in advance of President Obama’s upcoming visit to Israel. The network, whose ratings have risen significantly over the past year – it trails Fox but has led CNN for the past four years – has been broadcast in Israel by the HOT cable company since December 2011.
To cover the President’s visit, the network is sending its chief foreign affairs correspondent, Andrea Mitchell, who will be joined by NBC anchor Brian Mitchell and political commentator Chuck Todd. The network’s daily anchors – including its prime time stars Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and Lawrence O’Donnell - are expected to devote significant air time to the President’s visit next week, because, as Wagner says, U.S.-Israeli relations are “very important and hotly contested. It ignites a lot of passions and is relevant to our audience.”
Wagner, whose show was described last year by Dylan Byers in Politico as “beginning to wield a subtle but notable influence on the political discussion” believes that “whatever happens with Israel has a cascade effect in terms of American policy in the region. Whether it’s strengthening or fraying, the relationship obviously has an echo effect on what else we can or cannot do in the Middle East.”
While admitting that “a lot of us here at MSNBC would like to be able to do more foreign policy coverage,” Wagner said that the network’s focus on domestic and political issues is completely warranted “because we are coming out of an election cycle, there are a lot of legislative issues that could change American society.”
And the domestic agenda, she adds, “informs foreign policy, because there is a sense that because of our economic situation we don’t have the resources and to some degree we don’t have the interest in foreign policy that perhaps we should.” In any case, she said, “We are talking about ideology, and I think that has a resonance and importance to any community, whether they are Israeli, or French, or Egyptian or Mexican.”
The 35-year-old Wagner, who has been editor in chief of Fader, a music magazine, and executive editor of Not on our Watch, George Clooney’s anti-genocide advocacy group, came to MSNBC in 2010 as a political analyst and has anchored the noontime NOW show since 2011. The show, which features guest journalists and experts on political issues of the day, is known for its genial style and “youthful energy” attracting a significant audience among the most coveted of demographics – 25-54 years old.
“As host, she sees herself as the moderator, and there is a near unanimous feeling among guests that her ability to facilitate – rather than dominate – the conversation is what makes it feel genuine and organic,” Byers wrote.
One Republican strategist told Politico, however, that “the thrust of Wagner’s show is snide Democratic elites speaking condescendingly to viewers,” but Wagner rejects the hyper-partisan label that people try to affix to her and to her network as well as the parallel lines that people draw between MSNBC and Fox.
“I think MSNBC is unfairly painted as being intolerant of the other side – and there may be incredulity here – but I don’t think that you see the misinformation and falsities spread about the other side here on MSNBC the way that you do on some other networks, (that will remain nameless). There are a variety of viewpoints on MSNBC from morning to evening, including programs that are hosted by conservatives that are robust and are driven by the conservative point of view.”
“There is a progressive sentiment that informs this channel,” she adds, “but that is by no means handed down to us from on high. I have Republicans on my show, there have been conservatives: they may get challenged, but they do not get vilified.”
"I have a genuine interest in the Republican party reforming itself to become a more modern party, I think it’s very important and I think there is an argument to be made for conservatism. But I also think it is important to point out disingenuous political gimmickry where it exists, and I think that that is what is happening today. That said, when the president finally began talking about his drone program, you saw a very even-handed, if not very critical, assessment of what he is doing, on our show.”
Now that MSNBC is broadcast in over 30 countries worldwide, I asked Wagner if she has foreign audiences in mind in her programs. “Sure,” Wagner replies, “I am a first-general American on my mother’s side. She lives in Europe, and she loves MSNBC (and not just my show).”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)